前言
本文从操作系统实际调用角度(以CentOS Linux release 7.5操作系统为示例),力求追根溯源看IO的每一步操作到底发生了什么。
关于如何查看系统调用,Linux可以使用 strace 来查看任何软件的系统调动(这是个很好的分析学习方法):strace -ff -o ./out java TestJava
一 BIO
- /**
- * Alipay.com Inc. Copyright (c) 2004-2020 All Rights Reserved.
- */
- package io;
- import java.io.*;
- import java.net.ServerSocket;
- import java.net.Socket;
- /**
- * @author xiangyong.ding
- * @version $Id: TestSocket.java, v 0.1 2020年08月02日 20:56 xiangyong.ding Exp $
- */
- public class BIOSocket {
- public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
- ServerSocket serverSocket = new ServerSocket(8090);
- System.out.println("step1: new ServerSocket ");
- while (true) {
- Socket client = serverSocket.accept();
- System.out.println("step2: client\t" + client.getPort());
- new Thread(() -> {
- try {
- InputStream in = client.getInputStream();
- BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(in));
- while (true) {
- System.out.println(reader.readLine());
- }
- } catch (IOException e) {
- e.printStackTrace();
- }
- }).start();
- }
- }
- }
1 发生的系统调用
启动时
- socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 5
- bind(5, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(8090), sin_addr=inet_addr("0.0.0.0")}, 16) = 0
- listen(5, 50) = 0
- poll([{fd=5, events=POLLIN|POLLERR}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=5, revents=POLLIN}])
poll函数会阻塞直到其中任何一个fd发生事件。
有客户端连接后
- accept(5, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(10253), sin_addr=inet_addr("42.120.74.252")}, [16]) = 6
- clone(child_stack=0x7f013e5c4fb0, flags=CLONE_VM|CLONE_FS|CLONE_FILES|CLONE_SIGHAND|CLONE_THREAD|CLONE_SYSVSEM|CLONE_SETTLS|CLONE_PARENT_SETTID|CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID, parent_tidptr=0x7f013e5c59d0, tls=0x7f013e5c5700, child_tidptr=0x7f013e5c59d0) = 13168
- poll([{fd=5, events=POLLIN|POLLERR}], 1, -1
抛出线程(即我们代码里的 new Thread() )后,继续poll阻塞等待连接。
clone出来的线程
- recvfrom(6, "hello,bio\n", 8192, 0, NULL, NULL) =
关于对recvfrom函数的说明,其中第四个参数0 表示这是一个阻塞调用。
客户端发送数据后
- recvfrom(6, "hello,bio\n", 8192, 0, NULL, NULL) = 10
2 优缺点
优点
代码简单,逻辑清晰。
缺点
- 由于stream的read操作是阻塞读,面对多个连接时 每个连接需要每线程。无法处理大量连接(C10K问题)。
- 误区:可见JDK1.8中对于最初的BIO,在Linux OS下仍然使用的poll,poll本身也是相对比较高效的多路复用函数(支持非阻塞、多个socket同时检查event),只是限于JDK最初的stream API限制,无法支持非阻塞读取。
二 NIO(non block)
改进:使用NIO API,将阻塞变为非阻塞, 不需要大量线程。
- /**
- * Alipay.com Inc. Copyright (c) 2004-2020 All Rights Reserved.
- */
- package io;
- import java.io.IOException;
- import java.net.InetSocketAddress;
- import java.nio.ByteBuffer;
- import java.nio.channels.ServerSocketChannel;
- import java.nio.channels.SocketChannel;
- import java.util.LinkedList;
- /**
- * @author xiangyong.ding
- * @version $Id: NioSocket.java, v 0.1 2020年08月09日 11:25 xiangyong.ding Exp $
- */
- public class NIOSocket {
- private static LinkedList<SocketChannel> clients = new LinkedList<>();
- private static void startClientChannelHandleThread(){
- new Thread(() -> {
- while (true){
- ByteBuffer buffer = ByteBuffer.allocateDirect(4096);
- //处理客户端连接
- for (SocketChannel c : clients) {
- // 非阻塞, >0 表示读取到的字节数量, 0或-1表示未读取到或读取异常
- int num = 0;
- try {
- num = c.read(buffer);
- } catch (IOException e) {
- e.printStackTrace();
- }
- if (num > 0) {
- buffer.flip();
- byte[] clientBytes = new byte[buffer.limit()];
- //从缓冲区 读取到内存中
- buffer.get(clientBytes);
- System.out.println(c.socket().getPort() + ":" + new String(clientBytes));
- //清空缓冲区
- buffer.clear();
- }
- }
- }
- }).start();
- }
- public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
- //new socket,开启监听
- ServerSocketChannel socketChannel = ServerSocketChannel.open();
- socketChannel.bind(new InetSocketAddress(9090));
- //设置阻塞接受客户端连接
- socketChannel.configureBlocking(true);
- //开始client处理线程
- startClientChannelHandleThread();
- while (true) {
- //接受客户端连接; 非阻塞,无客户端返回null(操作系统返回-1)
- SocketChannel client = socketChannel.accept();
- if (client == null) {
- //System.out.println("no client");
- } else {
- //设置读非阻塞
- client.configureBlocking(false);
- int port = client.socket().getPort();
- System.out.println("client port :" + port);
- clients.add(client);
- }
- }
- }
- }
1 发生的系统调用
主线程
- socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 4
- bind(4, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(9090), sin_addr=inet_addr("0.0.0.0")}, 16) = 0
- listen(4, 50) = 0
- fcntl(4, F_SETFL, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK) = 0
- accept(4, 0x7fe26414e680, 0x7fe26c376710) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)
有连接后,子线程
- read(6, 0x7f3f415b1c50, 4096) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)
- read(6, 0x7f3f415b1c50, 4096) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)
- ...
资源使用情况:
2 优缺点
优点
线程数大大减少。
缺点
需要程序自己扫描 每个连接read,需要 O(n)时间复杂度系统调用 (此时可能只有一个连接发送了数据),高频系统调用(导致CPU 用户态内核态切换)高。导致CPU消耗很高。
三 多路复用器(select、poll、epoll)
改进:不需要用户扫描所有连接,由kernel 给出哪些连接有数据,然后应用从有数据的连接读取数据。
1 epoll
- import java.net.InetSocketAddress;
- import java.nio.ByteBuffer;
- import java.nio.channels.SelectionKey;
- import java.nio.channels.Selector;
- import java.nio.channels.ServerSocketChannel;
- import java.nio.channels.SocketChannel;
- import java.util.Iterator;
- import java.util.LinkedList;
- import java.util.Set;
- /**
- * 多路复用socket
- *
- * @author xiangyong.ding
- * @version $Id: MultiplexingSocket.java, v 0.1 2020年08月09日 12:19 xiangyong.ding Exp $
- */
- public class MultiplexingSocket {
- static ByteBuffer buffer = ByteBuffer.allocateDirect(4096);
- public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
- LinkedList<SocketChannel> clients = new LinkedList<>();
- //1.启动server
- //new socket,开启监听
- ServerSocketChannel socketChannel = ServerSocketChannel.open();
- socketChannel.bind(new InetSocketAddress(9090));
- //设置非阻塞,接受客户端
- socketChannel.configureBlocking(false);
- //多路复用器(JDK包装的代理,select /poll/epoll/kqueue)
- Selector selector = Selector.open(); //java自动代理,默认为epoll
- //Selector selector = PollSelectorProvider.provider().openSelector();//指定为poll
- //将服务端socket 注册到 多路复用器
- socketChannel.register(selector, SelectionKey.OP_ACCEPT);
- //2. 轮训多路复用器
- // 先询问有没有连接,如果有则返回数量以及对应的对象(fd)
- while (selector.select() > 0) {
- System.out.println();
- Set<SelectionKey> selectionKeys = selector.selectedKeys();
- Iterator<SelectionKey> iter = selectionKeys.iterator();
- while (iter.hasNext()) {
- SelectionKey key = iter.next();
- iter.remove();
- //2.1 处理新的连接
- if (key.isAcceptable()) {
- //接受客户端连接; 非阻塞,无客户端返回null(操作系统返回-1)
- SocketChannel client = socketChannel.accept();
- //设置读非阻塞
- client.configureBlocking(false);
- //同样,把client也注册到selector
- client.register(selector, SelectionKey.OP_READ);
- System.out.println("new client : " + client.getRemoteAddress());
- }
- //2.2 处理读取数据
- else if (key.isReadable()) {
- readDataFromSocket(key);
- }
- }
- }
- }
- protected static void readDataFromSocket(SelectionKey key) throws Exception {
- SocketChannel socketChannel = (SocketChannel) key.channel();
- // 非阻塞, >0 表示读取到的字节数量, 0或-1表示未读取到或读取异常
- // 请注意:这个例子降低复杂度,不考虑报文大于buffer size的情况
- int num = socketChannel.read(buffer);
- if (num > 0) {
- buffer.flip();
- byte[] clientBytes = new byte[buffer.limit()];
- //从缓冲区 读取到内存中
- buffer.get(clientBytes);
- System.out.println(socketChannel.socket().getPort() + ":" + new String(clientBytes));
- //清空缓冲区
- buffer.clear();
- }
- }
- }
2 发生的系统调用
启动
- socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 4
- bind(4, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(9090), sin_addr=inet_addr("0.0.0.0")}, 16) = 0
- listen(4, 50)
- fcntl(4, F_SETFL, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK) = 0
- epoll_create(256) = 7
- epoll_ctl(7, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 5, {EPOLLIN, {u32=5, u64=4324783852322029573}}) = 0
- epoll_ctl(7, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 4, {EPOLLIN, {u32=4, u64=158913789956}}) = 0
- epoll_wait(7
关于对epoll_create(对应着Java的 Selector selector = Selector.open()) 的说明,本质上是在内存的操作系统保留区,创建一个epoll数据结构。用于后面当有client连接时,向该epoll区中添加监听。
有连接
- epoll_wait(7,[{EPOLLIN, {u32=4, u64=158913789956}}], 8192, -1) = 1
- accept(4, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(29597), sin_addr=inet_addr("42.120.74.252")}, [16]) = 8
- fcntl(8, F_SETFL, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK) = 0
- epoll_ctl(7, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 8, {EPOLLIN, {u32=8, u64=3212844375897800712}}) = 0
关于epoll_ctl (对应着Java的 client.register(selector, SelectionKey.OP_READ) )。其中 EPOLLIN 恰好对应着Java的 SelectionKey.OP_READ 即监听数据到达读取事件。
客户端发送数据
- epoll_wait(7,[{EPOLLIN, {u32=8, u64=3212844375897800712}}], 8192, -1) = 1
- read(8, "hello,multiplex\n", 4096) = 16
- epoll_wait(7,
note:epoll_wait第四个参数-1表示block。
poll 和 epoll 对比
根据“1.BIO”中的poll函数调用和epoll函数对比如下:
poll和epoll本质上都是同步IO, 区别于BIO的是 多路复用充分降低了 system call,而epoll更进一步,再次降低了system call的时间复杂度。
3 优缺点
优点
- 线程数同样很少,甚至可以把acceptor线程和worker线程使用同一个。
- 时间复杂度低,Java实现的Selector(在Linux OS下使用的epoll函数)支持多个clientChannel事件的一次性获取,且时间复杂度维持在O(1)。
- CPU使用低:得益于Selector,我们不用向 “2.NIO”中需要自己一个个ClientChannel手动去检查事件,因此使得CPU使用率大大降低。
缺点
- 数据处理麻烦:目前socketChannel.read 读取数据完全是基于字节的,当我们需要需要作为HTTP服务网关时,对于HTTP协议的处理完全需要自己解析,这是个庞大、烦杂、容易出错的工作。
-
性能
- 现有socket数据的读取(socketChannel.read(buffer))全部通过一个buffer 缓冲区来接受,一旦连接多起来,这无疑是一个单线程读取,性能无疑是个问题。
- 那么此时buffer我们每次读取都重新new出来呢?如果每次都new出来,这样的内存碎片对于GC无疑是一场灾难。如何平衡地协调好buffer的共享,既保证性能,又保证线程安全,这是个难题。
四 Netty
1 研究的目标源码(netty提供的入门example)
TelnetServer
- package telnet;
- import io.netty.bootstrap.ServerBootstrap;
- import io.netty.channel.EventLoopGroup;
- import io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoopGroup;
- import io.netty.channel.socket.nio.NioServerSocketChannel;
- import io.netty.handler.logging.LogLevel;
- import io.netty.handler.logging.LoggingHandler;
- import io.netty.handler.ssl.SslContext;
- import io.netty.handler.ssl.SslContextBuilder;
- import io.netty.handler.ssl.util.SelfSignedCertificate;
- /**
- * Simplistic telnet server.
- */
- public final class TelnetServer {
- static final boolean SSL = System.getProperty("ssl") != null;
- static final int PORT = Integer.parseInt(System.getProperty("port", SSL? "8992" : "8023"));
- public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
- // Configure SSL.
- final SslContext sslCtx;
- if (SSL) {
- SelfSignedCertificate ssc = new SelfSignedCertificate();
- sslCtx = SslContextBuilder.forServer(ssc.certificate(), ssc.privateKey()).build();
- } else {
- sslCtx = null;
- }
- EventLoopGroup bossGroup = new NioEventLoopGroup(1);
- EventLoopGroup workerGroup = new NioEventLoopGroup();
- try {
- ServerBootstrap b = new ServerBootstrap();
- b.group(bossGroup, workerGroup)
- .channel(NioServerSocketChannel.class)
- .handler(new LoggingHandler(LogLevel.INFO))
- .childHandler(new TelnetServerInitializer(sslCtx));
- b.bind(PORT).sync().channel().closeFuture().sync();
- } finally {
- bossGroup.shutdownGracefully();
- workerGroup.shutdownGracefully();
- }
- }
- }
TelnetServerHandler
- package telnet;
- import io.netty.channel.ChannelFuture;
- import io.netty.channel.ChannelFutureListener;
- import io.netty.channel.ChannelHandler.Sharable;
- import io.netty.channel.ChannelHandlerContext;
- import io.netty.channel.SimpleChannelInboundHandler;
- import java.net.InetAddress;
- import java.util.Date;
- /**
- * Handles a server-side channel.
- */
- @Sharable
- public class TelnetServerHandler extends SimpleChannelInboundHandler<String> {
- @Override
- public void channelActive(ChannelHandlerContext ctx) throws Exception {
- // Send greeting for a new connection.
- ctx.write("Welcome to " + InetAddress.getLocalHost().getHostName() + "!\r\n");
- ctx.write("It is " + new Date() + " now.\r\n");
- ctx.flush();
- }
- @Override
- public void channelRead0(ChannelHandlerContext ctx, String request) throws Exception {
- // Generate and write a response.
- String response;
- boolean close = false;
- if (request.isEmpty()) {
- response = "Please type something.\r\n";
- } else if ("bye".equals(request.toLowerCase())) {
- response = "Have a good day!\r\n";
- close = true;
- } else {
- response = "Did you say '" + request + "'?\r\n";
- }
- // We do not need to write a ChannelBuffer here.
- // We know the encoder inserted at TelnetPipelineFactory will do the conversion.
- ChannelFuture future = ctx.write(response);
- // Close the connection after sending 'Have a good day!'
- // if the client has sent 'bye'.
- if (close) {
- future.addListener(ChannelFutureListener.CLOSE);
- }
- }
- @Override
- public void channelReadComplete(ChannelHandlerContext ctx) {
- ctx.flush();
- }
- @Override
- public void exceptionCaught(ChannelHandlerContext ctx, Throwable cause) {
- cause.printStackTrace();
- ctx.close();
- }
- }
TelnetServerInitializer
- package telnet;
- import io.netty.channel.ChannelInitializer;
- import io.netty.channel.ChannelPipeline;
- import io.netty.channel.socket.SocketChannel;
- import io.netty.handler.codec.DelimiterBasedFrameDecoder;
- import io.netty.handler.codec.Delimiters;
- import io.netty.handler.codec.string.StringDecoder;
- import io.netty.handler.codec.string.StringEncoder;
- import io.netty.handler.ssl.SslContext;
- /**
- * Creates a newly configured {@link ChannelPipeline} for a new channel.
- */
- public class TelnetServerInitializer extends ChannelInitializer<SocketChannel> {
- private static final StringDecoder DECODER = new StringDecoder();
- private static final StringEncoder ENCODER = new StringEncoder();
- private static final TelnetServerHandler SERVER_HANDLER = new TelnetServerHandler();
- private final SslContext sslCtx;
- public TelnetServerInitializer(SslContext sslCtx) {
- this.sslCtx = sslCtx;
- }
- @Override
- public void initChannel(SocketChannel ch) throws Exception {
- ChannelPipeline pipeline = ch.pipeline();
- if (sslCtx != null) {
- pipeline.addLast(sslCtx.newHandler(ch.alloc()));
- }
- // Add the text line codec combination first,
- pipeline.addLast(new DelimiterBasedFrameDecoder(8192, Delimiters.lineDelimiter()));
- // the encoder and decoder are static as these are sharable
- pipeline.addLast(DECODER);
- pipeline.addLast(ENCODER);
- // and then business logic.
- pipeline.addLast(SERVER_HANDLER);
- }
- }
2 启动后的系统调用
主线程(23109)
- ## 256无实际作用,这里只为了兼容旧版kernel api
- epoll_create(256) = 7epoll_ctl(7, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 5, {EPOLLIN, {u32=5, u64=5477705356928876549}}) = 0
- epoll_create(256) = 10epoll_ctl(10, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 8, {EPOLLIN, {u32=8, u64=17041805914081853448}}) = 0
- epoll_create(256) = 13
- epoll_ctl(13, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 11, {EPOLLIN, {u32=11, u64=17042151607409573899}}) = 0
- epoll_create(256) = 16
- epoll_ctl(16, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 14, {EPOLLIN, {u32=14, u64=17042497300737294350}}) = 0
- epoll_create(256) = 19
- epoll_ctl(19, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 17, {EPOLLIN, {u32=17, u64=17042561450368827409}}) = 0
- epoll_create(256) = 10
- socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 20
- clone(child_stack=0x7fc3c509afb0, flags=CLONE_VM|CLONE_FS|CLONE_FILES|CLONE_SIGHAND|CLONE_THREAD|CLONE_SYSVSEM|CLONE_SETTLS|CLONE_PARENT_SETTID|CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID, parent_tidptr=0x7fc3c509b9d0, tls=0x7fc3c509b700, child_tidptr=0x7fc3c509b9d0) = 23130
概括为:
- 向OS新建socket,并开启clone boss线程23130。
- 为BOSS创建了一个epoll(论证参见下面“boss”),每个worker创建一个epoll数据结构(本质上是在kernel内存区创建了一个数据结构,用于后续监听)。
- 创建boss线程监听的socket(本质上在kernel中创建一个数据结构)。
boss(23130)
- bind(20, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(8023), sin_addr=inet_addr("0.0.0.0")}, 16) = 0
- listen(20, 128) = 0
- getsockname(20, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(8023), sin_addr=inet_addr("0.0.0.0")}, [16]) = 0
- getsockname(20, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(8023), sin_addr=inet_addr("0.0.0.0")}, [16]) = 0
- ##将fd为7号epoll和fd为20号的socket绑定,事件:epoll_ctl_add和epoll_ctl_mod
- epoll_ctl(7, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 20, {EPOLLIN, {u32=20, u64=14198059139132817428}}) = 0
- epoll_ctl(7, EPOLL_CTL_MOD, 20, {EPOLLIN, {u32=20, u64=20}}) = 0
- epoll_wait(7, [{EPOLLIN, {u32=5, u64=17295150779149058053}}], 8192, 1000) = 1
- epoll_wait(7, [], 8192, 1000) = 0(不断轮训,1S超时一次)
概括为:
- 将上一步中main线程创建的fd:20绑定端口8023,并开启监听(网卡负责监听和接受连接和数据,kernel则负责路由到具体进程,具体参见:关于socket和bind和listen,TODO )。
- 将7号socket对应的fd绑定到20号对应的epoll数据结构上去(都是操作kernel中的内存)。
- 开始1S中一次阻塞等待epoll有任何连接或数据到达。
3 客户端连接
boss (23130)
- accept(20, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(11144), sin_addr=inet_addr("42.120.74.122")}, [16]) = 24
- getsockname(24, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(8023), sin_addr=inet_addr("192.168.0.120")}, [16]) = 0
- getsockname(24, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(8023), sin_addr=inet_addr("192.168.0.120")}, [16]) = 0
- setsockopt(24, SOL_TCP, TCP_NODELAY, [1], 4) = 0
- getsockopt(24, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUF, [87040], [4]) = 0
- getsockopt(24, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUF, [87040], [4]) = 0
- ##抛出 work线程
- clone(child_stack=0x7fc3c4c98fb0, flags=CLONE_VM|CLONE_FS|CLONE_FILES|CLONE_SIGHAND|CLONE_THREAD|CLONE_SYSVSEM|CLONE_SETTLS|CLONE_PARENT_SETTID|CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID, parent_tidptr=0x7fc3c4c999d0, tls=0x7fc3c4c99700, child_tidptr=0x7fc3c4c999d0) = 2301
worker (2301)
- writev(24, [{"Welcome to iZbp14e1g9ztpshfrla9m"..., 37}, {"It is Sun Aug 23 15:44:14 CST 20"..., 41}], 2) = 78
- epoll_ctl(13, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 24, {EPOLLIN, {u32=24, u64=24}}) = 0
- epoll_ctl(13, EPOLL_CTL_MOD, 24, {EPOLLIN, {u32=24, u64=14180008216221450264}}) = 0
- epoll_wait(13, [{EPOLLIN, {u32=11, u64=17042151607409573899}}], 8192, 1000) = 1
- read(11, "\1", 128) = 1
- ##开始无限loop
- epoll_wait(13, [], 8192, 1000) = 0
- epoll_wait(13, [{EPOLLIN, {u32=24, u64=24}}], 8192, 1000) = 1
概括:
- 当BOSS轮训epoll_wait等到了连接后,首先accept得到该socket对应的fd。
- 连接建立后 BOSS立马抛出一个线程(clone函数)。
- worker(即新建的线程)写入了一段数据(这里是业务逻辑)。
- worker将该client对应的fd绑定到了13号epoll上。
- worker继续轮训监听13号epoll。
4 客户端主动发送数据
worker(2301)
- read(24, "i am daojian\r\n", 1024) = 14
- write(24, "Did you say 'i am daojian'?\r\n", 29) = 29
- ##继续无限loop
- epoll_wait(13, [], 8192, 1000) = 0
概括为:
- wait到数据后,立即read到用户控件内存中(读取1024个字节到 用户控件某个buff中)。
- 写入数据(业务逻辑,不必太关注)。
- 继续轮训等待13号epoll。
5 客户端发送bye报文,服务器断开TCP连接
worker(2301)
- read(24, "bye\r\n", 1024) = 5
- write(24, "Have a good day!\r\n", 18) = 18
- getsockopt(24, SOL_SOCKET, SO_LINGER, {onoff=0, linger=0}, [8]) = 0
- dup2(25, 24) = 24
- ##从epoll数据结构中(OS)中删除fd为24的socket
- epoll_ctl(13, EPOLL_CTL_DEL, 24, 0x7f702dd531e0) = -1 ENOENT
- ##关闭24 socket
- close(24) = 0
- ##继续等待13 epoll数据
- epoll_wait(13, [], 8192, 1000) = 0
断开客户端连接概括为:
- 从epoll中删除该客户端对应的fd(这里触发源头没找到,可能是boss)。
- close关闭客户端24号fd。
- 继续轮训epoll。
6 五个客户端同时连接
boss线程(23130)
- accept(20, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(1846), sin_addr=inet_addr("42.120.74.122")}, [16]) = 24
- clone(child_stack=0x7f702cc51fb0, flags=CLONE_VM|CLONE_FS|CLONE_FILES|CLONE_SIGHAND|CLONE_THREAD|CLONE_SYSVSEM|CLONE_SETTLS|CLONE_PARENT_SETTID|CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID, parent_tidptr=0x7f702cc529d0, tls=0x7f702cc52700, child_tidptr=0x7f702cc529d0) = 10035
- accept(20, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(42067), sin_addr=inet_addr("42.120.74.122")}, [16]) = 26
- clone(child_stack=0x7f702cb50fb0, flags=CLONE_VM|CLONE_FS|CLONE_FILES|CLONE_SIGHAND|CLONE_THREAD|CLONE_SYSVSEM|CLONE_SETTLS|CLONE_PARENT_SETTID|CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID, parent_tidptr=0x7f702cb519d0, tls=0x7f702cb51700, child_tidptr=0x7f702cb519d0) = 10067
- ...
woker线程(10035,第一个连接)
- epoll_ctl(13, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 24, {EPOLLIN, {u32=24, u64=24}}) = 0
- epoll_ctl(13, EPOLL_CTL_MOD, 24, {EPOLLIN, {u32=24, u64=3226004877247250456}}) = 0
- epoll_wait(13, [{EPOLLIN, {u32=11, u64=17042151607409573899}}], 8192, 1000) = 1 = 1
- epoll_wait(13, [], 8192, 1000) = 0
worker线程(10067,第二个连接)
- epoll_ctl(16, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 26, {EPOLLIN, {u32=26, u64=26}}) = 0
- epoll_ctl(16, EPOLL_CTL_MOD, 26, {EPOLLIN, {u32=26, u64=3221483685433835546}}) = 0
- epoll_wait(16, [{EPOLLIN, {u32=14, u64=17042497300737294350}}], 8192, 1000) = 1
- epoll_wait(16, [], 8192, 1000) = 0
- epoll_wait(16, [], 8192, 1000) = 0
worker线程(10067,第二个连接)
- epoll_ctl(19, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 27, {EPOLLIN, {u32=27, u64=27}}) = 0
- epoll_ctl(19, EPOLL_CTL_MOD, 27, {EPOLLIN, {u32=27, u64=3216966479350071323}}) = 0
worker线程(8055,第四个连接)
- epoll_ctl(10, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 28, {EPOLLIN, {u32=28, u64=28}}) = 0
- epoll_ctl(10, EPOLL_CTL_MOD, 28, {EPOLLIN, {u32=28, u64=3302604828697427996}}) = 0
worker线程(10035,第五个连接,不在clone线程,而是复用了第一个epoll对应的worker)
- epoll_ctl(13, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 29, {EPOLLIN, {u32=29, u64=29}}) = 0
- epoll_ctl(13, EPOLL_CTL_MOD, 29, {EPOLLIN, {u32=29, u64=29}}) = 0
概括为:
- epoll和boss、worker之间的关系:一共有4个worker对应着4个epoll对象,boss和每个worker都有对应自己的epoll。
- boss根据epoll数量,平衡分配连接到每个worker对应的epoll中。
7 总结
下图通过对系统调用的调查得出 netty 和 kernel 交互图:
初始化直接创建5个epoll,其中7号为boss使用,专门用于处理和客户端连接;其余4个用来给worker使用,用户处理和客户端的数据交互。
work的线程数量,取决于初始化时创建了几个epoll,worker的复用本质上是epoll的复用。
work之间为什么要独立使用epoll?为什么不共享?
- 为了避免各个worker之间发生争抢连接处理,netty直接做了物理隔离,避免竞争。各个worker只负责处理自己管理的连接,并且后续该worker中的每个client的读写操作完全由 该线程单独处理,天然避免了资源竞争,避免了锁。
- worker单线程,性能考虑:worker不仅仅要epoll_wait,还是处理read、write逻辑,加入worker处理了过多的连接,势必造成这部分消耗时间片过多,来不及处理更多连接,性能下降。
8 优缺点
优点
- 数据处理:netty提供了大量成熟的数据处理组件(ENCODER、DECODER),HTTP、POP3拿来即用。
- 编码复杂度、可维护性:netty充分使得业务逻辑与网络处理解耦,只需要少量的BootStrap配置即可,更多的集中在业务逻辑处理上。
- 性能:netty提供了的ByteBuf(底层Java原生的ByteBuffer),提供了池化的ByteBuf,兼顾读取性能和ByteBuf内存分配(在后续文档中会再做详解)。
缺点
- 入门有一定难度。
五 AIO
1 启动
main线程
- epoll_create(256) = 5
- epoll_ctl(5, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 6, {EPOLLIN, {u32=6, u64=11590018039084482566}}) = 0
- ##创建BOSS 线程(Proactor)
- clone(child_stack=0x7f340ac06fb0, flags=CLONE_VM|CLONE_FS|CLONE_FILES|CLONE_SIGHAND|CLONE_THREAD|CLONE_SYSVSEM|CLONE_SETTLS|CLONE_PARENT_SETTID|CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID, parent_tidptr=0x7f340ac079d0, tls=0x7f340ac07700, child_tidptr=0x7f340ac079d0) = 22704
- socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 8
- setsockopt(8, SOL_IPV6, IPV6_V6ONLY, [0], 4) = 0
- setsockopt(8, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
- bind(8, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(9090), inet_pton(AF_INET6, "::", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo=0, sin6_scope_id=0}, 28) = 0
- listen(8, 50)
- accept(8, 0x7f67d01b3120, 0x7f67d9246690) = -1
- epoll_ctl(5, EPOLL_CTL_MOD, 8, {EPOLLIN|EPOLLONESHOT, {u32=8, u64=15380749440025362440}}) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
- epoll_ctl(5, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 8, {EPOLLIN|EPOLLONESHOT, {u32=8, u64=15380749440025362440}}) = 0
- read(0,
22704(BOSS 线程(Proactor))
- epoll_wait(5, <unfinished ...>
2 请求连接
22704(BOSS 线程(Proactor))处理连接
- epoll_wait(5,[{EPOLLIN, {u32=9, u64=4294967305}}], 512, -1) = 1
- accept(8, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(55320), inet_pton(AF_INET6, "::ffff:36.24.32.140", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo=0, sin6_scope_id=0}, [28]) = 9
- clone(child_stack=0x7ff35c99ffb0, flags=CLONE_VM|CLONE_FS|CLONE_FILES|CLONE_SIGHAND|CLONE_THREAD|CLONE_SYSVSEM|CLONE_SETTLS|CLONE_PARENT_SETTID|CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID, parent_tidptr=0x7ff35c9a09d0, tls=0x7ff35c9a0700, child_tidptr=0x7ff35c9a09d0) = 26241
- epoll_wait(5, <unfinished ...>
26241
- #将client 连接的FD加入到BOSS的epoll中,以便BOSS线程监听网络事件
- epoll_ctl(5, EPOLL_CTL_MOD, 9, {EPOLLIN|EPOLLONESHOT, {u32=9, u64=4398046511113}}) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
- epoll_ctl(5, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 9, {EPOLLIN|EPOLLONESHOT, {u32=9, u64=4398046511113}}) = 0
- accept(8, 0x7ff3440008c0, 0x7ff35c99f4d0) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)
- epoll_ctl(5, EPOLL_CTL_MOD, 8, {EPOLLIN|EPOLLONESHOT, {u32=8, u64=8}}) = 0
3 客户端发送数据
22704(BOSS 线程(Proactor))处理连接
- epoll_wait(5,[{EPOLLIN, {u32=9, u64=4294967305}}], 512, -1) = 1
- ##数据读出
- read(9, "daojian111\r\n", 1024) = 12
- ##数据处理交给其他线程,这里由于线程池为空,需要先clone线程
- clone(child_stack=0x7ff35c99ffb0, flags=CLONE_VM|CLONE_FS|CLONE_FILES|CLONE_SIGHAND|CLONE_THREAD|CLONE_SYSVSEM|CLONE_SETTLS|CLONE_PARENT_SETTID|CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID, parent_tidptr=0x7ff35c9a09d0, tls=0x7ff35c9a0700, child_tidptr=0x7ff35c9a09d0) = 26532
复制线程处理,线程号26532
- write(1, "pool-1-thread-2-10received : dao"..., 41) = 41
- write(1, "\n", 1)
- accept(8, 0x7f11c400b5f0, 0x7f11f42fd4d0) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)
- epoll_ctl(5, EPOLL_CTL_MOD, 8, {EPOLLIN|EPOLLONESHOT, {u32=8, u64=8}}) = 0
4 总结
- 从系统调用角度,Java的AIO事实上是以多路复用(Linux上为epoll)等同步IO为基础,自行实现了异步事件分发。
- BOSS Thread负责处理连接,并分发事件。
- WORKER Thread只负责从BOSS接收的事件执行,不负责任何网络事件监听。
5 优缺点
优点
相比于前面的BIO、NIO,AIO已经封装好了任务调度,使用时只需关心任务处理。
缺点
- 事件处理完全由Thread Pool完成,对于同一个channel的多个事件可能会出现并发问题。
- 相比netty,buffer API不友好容易出错;编解码工作复杂。
原文链接:https://zhuanlan.51cto.com/art/202106/669120.htm